Proof from the Experts
|
Finally found expert reference to the fact that vaccines cause food allergies! |
|
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/113/1/170
PEDIATRICS Vol.
113 No. 1 January 2004, pp. 170-171
Tetsuo
Nakayama, MD We feel relieved after reading the paper by Pool et al and the VAERS Team1 on the prevalence of gelatin allergy in the United States. They conducted a retrospective analysis after measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination. Among 26 cases of anaphylaxis, only 6 (27%) were positive for anti-gelatin IgE antibodies. The rate of anaphylactic reactions reported to the VAERS is 1.8 per 1 million doses, and no substantial increase in number of reported allergic events after MMR was observed since the introduction of gelatin-containing diptheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) in 1997. We reported that the cases of anaphylaxis or urticaria showed high positive rates of anti-gelatin IgE antibodies, and we speculated the causal relationship of the sensitization by gelatin-containing DTaP.2 Discontinuation of gelatin-containing DTaP reduced the incidence of anaphylaxis after 1999,3 and we have no report of anaphylaxis after vaccination with live virus vaccines containing hydrolyzed porcine gelatin in the last few years. Thus, we were solicitous for the incidence of anaphylaxis in the United States, but they reported that the incidence of gelatin allergy was lower than that observed in Japan. But we suppose the different prevalence of anti-gelatin IgE depends on sensitivity for the detection of IgE antibodies against gelatin and especially on the nature of antigen for the assay. The same was the reason why the sensitization against gelatin increased in Japan. Some vaccine manufactures used poorly hydrolyzed bovine gelatin in DTaP, and some used hydrolyzed porcine gelatin. A large number of patients with anaphylaxis had a history of having DTaP containing poorly hydrolyzed bovine gelatin. Poorly hydrolyzed bovine gelatin was immunogenic when administered with alum adjuvant. They did not mention the nature of gelatin in DTaP in the United States in their paper, and we suppose that it was probably highly hydrolyzed porcine gelatin (2–3 kDa). Although it is considered as less immunogenic, gelatin-free DTaP is desirable to avoid the possibility of unnecessary sensitization against gelatin. |
|
http://www.texaschildrens.org/carecenters/vaccine/Vaccines_SideEffects.aspx |
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Vaccine Components
The more typical route of
sensitization, however, is
via the absorption of aluminum
through
hyposensitization
injections and
vaccines.[5]
Hyposensitization injections are used as treatment for IgE-mediated
allergies, and the most commonly used extracts in these solutions are
aluminum-contacting antigens. Additionally, aluminum compounds have been
widely used as adjuvants in prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines to
potentiate the immune response. Aluminum-containing vaccines are prepared by
the adsorption of antigens onto aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate
gels or by the precipitation of antigens in a solution of potassium aluminum
sulfate.[6] |
|
Jones-Mote
Hypersensitivity:
Protein-Adjuvant Reactions
|
|
Delayed vaccine
reactions were also the cause
of thyroid
disease, allergies,
arthritis, tumors and seizures in both cats and dogs.
|
|
There are
already a number of compelling arguments against vaccination, and now there
may be one more to add to the list.
According to a new study published
in the medical journal Pediatrics, one of the most common childhood
vaccinations may actually increase the risk of allergies.
After noting that rates of allergies have increased dramatically over the years in proportion to the prevalence of vaccinations, researchers from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, decided to put their theory to the test. Specifically, they chose to examine the rates of allergies among children who had been vaccinated against measles vs. those who had been infected with the virus. They examined the records of over 12,000 children between the ages of 5 and 13 and found that 73 percent of them had been vaccinated against measles, 20 percent had had a case of the virus, and 14 percent hadn't had the illness or the vaccine. According to the researchers "allergies were less likely in children who had had a bout of measles, but not in those who had been vaccinated against measles." Of course, I have no doubt that most mainstream medical authorities would argue that the benefits of the measles vaccine outweigh the risk of allergies. Unfortunately, that's just not true. The first thing to keep in mind in regard to the measles is that it isn't the potentially lethal infection it was hundreds of years ago. In fact, in the October 2004 issue of Nutrition & Healing, Dr. Wright filled readers in on research done in the 1920s proving that death from measles is entirely preventable with a single, good-size dose of vitamin A. This simple, completely natural technique cut the death rate from measles to zero in treated children. But aside from simply being unnecessary, the measles vaccine has a much darker side as well… Before vaccination became the norm, nearly all children got the measles. The kids had the measles rash and fever for a few days and then recovered with a very strong anti-measles antibody response -- a response so strong that it would last a little girl throughout childhood and well into adulthood. When that little girl grows up and becomes pregnant, her unborn child is automatically protected by her antibodies against measles. Not only that, but those strong anti- measles antibodies are "passively transferred" from mother to her newborn child. The infant is then protected by mother's antibodies from getting the measles until age 4 or so, and the cycle can repeat itself over and over, with no loss of life. Today's vaccination program has altered this natural cycle -- and not for the better. A vaccinated little girl gets a much weaker anti-measles antibody response because the vaccine contains a deliberately "weakened" (attenuated) form of the virus. So when a vaccinated little girl grows up and becomes a mother, any anti-measles antibodies she has left to transfer to her infant are too weak to provide much protection at all. As Dr. Wright explained in the October 2004 issue of Nutrition & Healing, regular measles infection is much tougher on infants than it is on older children and poses more risk of complications (although, vitamin A will still prevent death). The bottom line here is that the fear that has been built up around measles over the past several centuries is unwarranted. In the long run, vaccinations against this infection may do children much more harm than good -- and battling a case of the measles may do them much more good than harm. Yours in good health, Amanda Ross Editor Nutrition & Healing - Dr. Jonathan Wright |
DISCLAIMER:
The information contained
herein is intended for educational purposes only. If you have a
medical problem, you need the help of a trained medical
professional. Don't be stupid and read something on a website and try it
without making sure it is safe for you to do so!
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
By using the information presented on this website, you agree to take FULL responsibility for yourself. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take responsibility for your own actions. You have the right to be healthy! I encourage you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research (or in partnership with a qualified health care professional - talk to your physician, chiropractor, and pharmacist. )
If you suspect you have a disease or health related condition of any kind, please learn and research! Learn from more then one source! If you are unable to learn, or if you are unable to help yourself, you should contact qualified health care professional practicing natural and holistic therapies immediately. The results reported on this website may NOT occur in all individuals.
Send email with questions or comments about this web site.
Visit my other websites at http://barbfeick.com
Barbara F. Gregory, Columbus, Ohio
Last modified:
November 12, 2009
|
|
|
|
Columbus_Buzz
