|
Pro from Curezone forum |
Con from Curezone |
|
Yes, the UZ is much better than the $10 zapper.
According to the report from
Dr. Mondo S., Dr. Loyd compared The Ultimate Zapper to ALL major
zappers. There is no reference that dual frequency zappers were
excluded. He concluded The Ultimate Zapper is superior to ALL
zappers. |
Actually, it may be the most powerful single frequency zapper, but that is where it ends. According to Dr. Lloyd, multiple frequency zappers are better. Dr. Lloyd manufactured and sold the MultiZap zapper as well as Rife units. |
|
As you know, Dr. Hulda Clark 's original zapper had a single frequency of 25,000 to 30,000 Hertz. Dr. Clark invented the zapper and she defined the zapper as a single-frequency device. None of this is news to you, of course, so I am a bit perplexed why you, by implication, are criticizing the definition of the inventor herself. In fact, there are no studies that I am aware of which show that a dual frequency or multi-frequency unit is superior to a single frequency unit. A single frequency, well-chosen, is all you need to kill all pathogens. This has been proven, in spades, by the 2,000 Hertz Ultimate Zapper for the past 11 years.
And The Ultimate Zapper offers a 3-month trial (only one other zapper offers this) and it is the only zapper in the world with a lifetime warranty. |
(ParaZapper): Dual frequency zappers produce better results according to the information that I have collected and they are about one third or less than the cost of some other mentioned on this forum. BTW, I want to submit that your waveform does not produce even harmonics. It does produce 2 sets of harmonics but sadly, each of these 2 sets of harmonics are only capable of adding up to 100 percent of the available power. The total power can not exceed 100 percent. The second set of harmonics which is produced by the shorter down time might be close matching what the set of even harmonics might contain, but it is not even harmonics. Almost every zapper, by nature, produces 2 sets of harmonics unless the zapper signal is digitally created. The 555 does not allow for exact timing of the duty cycle to a pure perfect 50 percent. I believe that the perfect matching of harmonics as an odd / even set of frequencies would be produced by a 66.666666 % / 33.333333 % duty cycle setup so that the primary frequency of the second period is exactly twice that of the primary frequency of the first period. AK???? |
|
The only real advantage that I can see from your zapper is the 10.4 volts that is output because you use a wall adapter. |
The stabilized waveform produced by the output bypass capacitor has some advantage but we dumped it when we developed the CCa. What we found was that the capacitor provided a placebo effect in that the pulse felt stronger but the actual results decreased. |
|
ParaZapper |
|
|
Pro from Curezone forum |
Con from Curezone |
|
When we originally
started, we produced a single frequency zapper of 2000 Hz
because we read it was better. We also produced one using both
2500 Hz and 30000 Hz which allowed the customers to choose which
frequency to use. The ones who used 2500 Hz only got better
results than those who used 30000 Hz only. Those who used both
frequncy got much better results. |
Actually, my statement is absolutely true. I have looked at dozens of zapper models from different companies and yours is more expensive than almost all of the dual frequency models that I have seen. |
|
(ParaZapper): Dual frequency zappers produce better results according to the information that I have collected and they are about one third or less than the cost of some other mentioned on this forum. |
The first kind of dual zapper is one that has a switch which enables you to choose one of 2 frequencies. This is the ParaZapper. Ooooh, maybe you avoid the subject of choosing frequencies because people will have to spend twice the time zapping if they want to use the 2 frequencies. That’s not so convenient. |
|
|
The obvious disadvantage
with dual zappers like the ParaZapper is that you need to zapper
at least twice as long because you have to do 1-hour zapping
cycles with each frequency, one at a time. It becomes more like
a frequency generator, in that sense. |
|
Harmonic Quad. |
|
|
The second kind of dual
zapper is one that has a composite wave made up of two
frequencies which are produced concurrently. You don’t have to
spend twice the time zapping with this one because this is a
single composite wave. There is only one zapper in this category
that I am aware of, the Harmonic Quad. |
Expensive |
|
Terminator |
|
|
You can just wear it under your sock! I like this one. Easy to use.- bfg |
|
ParaZapper