1a. Disease decline. Believe it or not, there isn't any convincing evidence through the statistics that vaccination reduced the death rate for any disease such as measles. So, where is the benefit? Measles deaths had declined by 99.4% before vaccination!
"Up to 90% of the total decline in the death rate of children between 1860-1965 because of whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and measles occurred before the introduction of immunizations and antibiotics." Dr Archie Kalokerinos, M.D.
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease." -Dr Robert Mendelsohn MD
http://www.alternative-doctor.com/vaccination/16reasons.htm
For example, health professionals claim that vaccinations are the reason for the low rate of measles today. This is simply not true. For instance, in 1962, the number of measles cases in America dropped from 800,000 to 500,000. But it wasn't until 1963 that the first measles vaccination was introduced. This shows a drop of 300,000 in measles cases before a single measles vaccination was ever administered.
Contrary to the belief that we are at serious risk for getting polio, diphtheria, pertussis, rubella, and the like, the facts show that we may be safer from these diseases if we are not immunized against them. For example, most doctors will say there is a fair chance that if you contract measles, it will come in the form of measles encephalitis, a potentially fatal disease. However, according to Dr. Roberts Mendelsohn, National Director of Project Head Start's Medical Consultation Service, and chairman of the Medical Licensing Committee for the State of Illinois, the chances of getting measles encephalitis is about 1in 100,000 measles cases in the average American home. So because of a 1 in 100,000 chance of getting measles encephalitis when one contracts measles, doctors prefer to administer the measles vaccination, which has been shown to be much more dangerous than measles itself.
For instance, the measles vaccine has been shown to cause retinopathy and blindness. (Marshall, G.S., Wright, P.F., Fenichel, G.M., Karzon, D.T. Diffuse retinopathy following measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Pediatrics 1985; 76:989-991.)
http://www.juiceguy.com/Vaccination-is-it-dangerous.shtml
MEASLES: In 1900 there were 13.3 measles deaths per 100,000 population. In 1955 (8 years before the measles vaccine) the death rate was .03/100,000. In the 1970's (post vaccine) the death rate was still .03/100,000. The most recent statistics (2000) from CDC indicates that there is 1 measles case for every one million citizens, and there were no deaths. Out of the reported 86 cases, vaccination status was known on 48, and 24 of those (50%) had been vaccinated. Most cases have been identified as being imported from other countries. The CDC states: "The consistently small number of unknown source cases suggests that measles is no longer endemic in the United States."
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=745370#i
There are already a number of compelling arguments against vaccination, and now there may be one more to add to the list. According to a new study published in the medical journal Pediatrics, one of the most common childhood vaccinations may actually increase the risk of allergies.
After noting that rates of allergies have increased dramatically over the years in proportion to the prevalence of vaccinations, researchers from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, decided to put their theory to the test. Specifically, they chose to examine the rates of allergies among children who had been vaccinated against measles vs. those who had been infected with the virus.
They examined the records of over 12,000 children between the ages of 5 and 13 and found that 73 percent of them had been vaccinated against measles, 20 percent had had a case of the virus, and 14 percent hadn't had the illness or the vaccine.
According to the researchers "allergies were less likely in children who had had a bout of measles, but not in those who had been vaccinated against measles."
Of course, I have no doubt that most mainstream medical authorities would argue that the benefits of the measles vaccine outweigh the risk of allergies. Unfortunately, that's just not true.
The first thing to keep in mind in regard to the measles is that it isn't the potentially lethal infection it was hundreds of years ago. In fact, in the October 2004 issue of Nutrition & Healing, Dr. Wright filled readers in on research done in the 1920s proving that death from measles is entirely preventable with a single, good-size dose of vitamin A. This simple, completely natural technique cut the death rate from measles to zero in treated children.
But aside from simply being unnecessary, the measles vaccine has a much darker side as well…
Before vaccination became the norm, nearly all children got the measles. The kids had the measles rash and fever for a few days and then recovered with a very strong anti-measles antibody response -- a response so strong that it would last a little girl throughout childhood and well into adulthood.
When that little girl grows up and becomes pregnant, her unborn child is automatically protected by her antibodies against measles. Not only that, but those strong anti- measles antibodies are "passively transferred" from mother to her newborn child. The infant is then protected by mother's antibodies from getting the measles until age 4 or so, and the cycle can repeat itself over and over, with no loss of life.
Today's vaccination program has altered this natural cycle -- and not for the better. A vaccinated little girl gets a much weaker anti-measles antibody response because the vaccine contains a deliberately "weakened" (attenuated) form of the virus. So when a vaccinated little girl grows up and becomes a mother, any anti-measles antibodies she has left to transfer to her infant are too weak to provide much protection at all.
As Dr. Wright explained in the October 2004 issue of Nutrition & Healing, regular measles infection is much tougher on infants than it is on older children and poses more risk of complications (although, vitamin A will still prevent death).
The bottom line here is that the fear that has been built up around measles over the past several centuries is unwarranted. In the long run, vaccinations against this infection may do children much more harm than good -- and battling a case of the measles may do them much more good than harm.
Yours in good health,
Amanda Ross
Editor
Nutrition & Healing